I’m curious if anyone has a good example of a hostile takeover that resulted in a successful post-merger integration. In the aftermath of the Kraft-Cadbury takeover, 20+ senior executives left Cadbury, complaints were made across departments about cultural differences and process changes, and the Kraft business was subsequently split into multiple companies in 2012, passing Cadbury off to the newly established “Mondelez International.” This would lead me to conclude that it was a failure, although it depends on your metric for success. I would expect many hostile takeovers would be extremely difficult to integrate due to lack of cooperation and bad chemistry. Does anyone have an example of a success? What is the strategic rationale for assuming control of a company that is unwilling to negotiate a deal?
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.