Scope of DD vs cost

  • This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 1 month ago by Dmitry Govorov.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #36323
    Dmitry Govorov
    Participant

    How would you normally decide if a full scale DD is worthy, together with expensive DD consultants costs, vis-a-vis limited DD first, and – subject to successful negotiations – follow with a more detailed / confirmatory DD?

    #39019
    Raid Almutairi
    Participant

    In my opinion,

    To overcome expensive DD consultants costs; DD can be structured in many phases or steps. First part is analyzing overall generic data that can be done in-house utilizing the available capabilities. Then, moving to more detailed DD that rely on one overall DD consultant. Finally, in depth DD phase which of course will involve other depth scope oriented consultants.

    Following above DD structure will ensure that buyer will only pay what is needed (Cost Control). Also, it will provide a smooth DD process with buyer as not all books are opened in early phases of the DD.

    Thanks

    #39085
    Aaron Teo
    Participant

    In my perspective, and in the context of a public listed company where acquisitions reaching certain thresholds (mandating shareholder’s approval), I will go for a Fullscale DD (on the basis that the costs are say less than 5% of the purchase consideration). This will enable the board to “outsource the risk” to these external consultants whereas ensuring that costs are not prohibitive. In the event that the costs are more than 5%, I would consider going for a limited DD, subject to discussion with the external consultants.

    #39138
    Ameera Alhawaj
    Participant

    Best practices differ especially in the case of big corporations and small businesses. For instance, while big corporations may be able to leverage on technology to screen a lot of firms as well as obtain huge amounts of information for due diligence, these advantages are not available for small businesses. This is given that the small businesses have limited finances as compared to the big corporations. Moreover, there exists a disparity with regards to definition of future states. In the case of big corporations, there exists clear laid out plans and teams that develop strategies on what is the desired state of the entity both in the short and long term. However, for small business, there is limited resources, talent as well as workforce to undertake these obligations.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Are you sure you
want to log out?

Book a Demo

Book a Demo

Contact us to discuss your goals and needs!

Contact us to discuss your goals and needs!

Request a Brochure

Request a Brochure

Contact us to discuss your goals and needs!

Contact us to discuss your goals and needs!

In order to become a charterholder you need to complete one of the IMAA programs