Interviews and reporting of findings in due diligence

This topic contains 7 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by  Michel Kropf 3 weeks, 5 days ago.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #121781

    Manuela van Ulzen
    Participant

    Would be very interested if you have any experience with interviewing people during the due diligence. Does it work? Will people answer your questions or are the more reserved?
    And do you have any good advice how to report the findings of a due diligence (so that it is easy to read and understand)?
    Thank you 🙂

    #121797

    FAHAD ALQAHTANI
    Participant

    Yes interviewing people during due diligence helps and it works. It can bring different levels of information and insights specially if the interview selection was diverse and at different employee levels. I believe if the purpose of the interview is to gain knowledge, insights and more information mostly people will be open to share and support. Preparing for the questions prior to the interviews will help develop statistics and graph for reporting purposes.

    #121819

    Yazeed Albaiz
    Participant

    Interviewing people during the due diligence does work. Just make sure to ask open ended questions and give space for the respondent to reply without rushing them to the next question. Also, try to keep asking why.

    reporting the findings would be on a likelihood/business impact basis. Thus, riskier material findings are on top the report.

    #121851

    Elizabeth Perlak
    Participant

    I think interviews are extremely valuable. Not only can it help clarify and understand facts that may have been found through document research and other activities but it can also serve as an opportunity to test hypothesis and probe about more intangible aspects of the organization. It is one thing to review a company’s HR documentation and written value and mission statements another entirely to receive feedback and depth of adoption by the employees.

    #121876

    Greg Kitchen
    Participant

    Agree with what others have said, it gives a qualitative and/or subjective perspective on data and information received. Often you can triangulate answers based on asking multiple employees similar questions if provided vague (written) answers in the data room. The questions may not always be things the company wants to commit to paper.

    #121917

    It is usefull but we definitely have to adjust responses for each employees’ motivations.

    #121973

    Millie Manning
    Participant

    In addition to the qualitative value that others have referenced, I think interviews can improve the DD process in two other ways: 1. allowing for more dialogue beneficial to integration planning and 2. building relationships to get buy-in from the target company employees. Since integration planning should start during DD, asking open-ended questions and giving space for descriptions of the target company’s current processes will inform how the acquiring company structures their integration planning. Secondly, if key contributors at the target company are involved in the conversations before the deal closes, they will feel included in the DD and planning processes, making them more likely to advocate for the changes resulting from the integration.

    #122054

    Michel Kropf
    Participant

    In our last acquisition, retention of key employees was important and part of the conditional payment we made. So it was important to meet and interview those persons to see if there is a fit.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Loading.. Please wait