Transparency on Retention

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #104472
    Jamie M
    Participant

    Should an acquiring company be transparent pre and/or post-closing on retention of employees, leadership etc. What are your experiences on experiences, best practices, pros and cons.

    #105562
    Melissa Lehman
    Participant

    Yes – I think you should disclose your intentions of leadership roles and include any key individuals as part of the closing. On the larger level, I don’t think you can promise that the organization as a whole will not be impacted but being transparent in your goals of the acquisition should be shared

    #107078
    Hedwig Duronic
    Participant

    I also think transparency is a must.
    Thinking of layoffs etc. it of course can be a disadvantage to communicate that too early. But if you don´t appear trustworthy to the employees/management of the acquired company the best employees will leave anyway

    #107668
    Dana Hoernke
    Participant

    In my experience, not being transparent initially helped boost participation in short-term projects immediately after the acquisition where we really needed the legacy knowledge. However, it did lead to poor company reviews later on. Being upfront about retention plans and leadership continuity can build trust and alleviate uncertainty among employees… but it is a delicate balance to not overshare sensitive information early on either.

    #112943
    Francisco Aires
    Participant

    Depends on each acquisition and its risks, but I consider yes, it must be in place a clear communication which will address all the “me” issues in a faster and clear way. Executives may be tempted to soften the message, which could lead into a meaningless message, think employees respect and prefer more transparency as the integration process need to be done in a prudent speed, which means the harder decisions must be taken and addressed during the communication otherwise that could lead to a lack of credibility.

    #113095
    Tack Kitanaka
    Participant

    I would be clear of the expectations for key management/employees pre-closing as these people frequently are the key drivers of the business values and without retaining them often times the acquired company fails to deliver; and then post close, will be transparent on retention/severance to avoid uncertainty causing doubts amongst the employees and keep the motivations and drivers for business integration at the optimal level. That said, retention/severance is a delicate issue from both legal/non-legal perspective and I would be cautious in the timing of transparency and how those are communicated to best avoid can of worms of legal/non-legal issues jumping out.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Are you sure you
want to log out?

In order to become a charterholder you need to complete one of the IMAA programs