[Jessica Lee]

The Cadbury-Kraft takeover is a classic example of how a company can defend itself in a hostile M&A battle. Here are some key takeaways from this historic event:

Engage Stakeholders

Cadbury did a fantastic job rallying public and shareholder support by highlighting their rich British heritage and beloved brand. This shows the power of engaging all stakeholders—not just shareholders—in a takeover.

Communicate Value

Cadbury clearly articulated their strong financial performance and future potential, arguing that Kraft’s offer undervalued them. This teaches us the importance of effective communication in highlighting a company’s value.

Operational Excellence

By showcasing their growth strategies and operational improvements, Cadbury demonstrated their ability to thrive independently. Continuous improvement and strategic foresight are essential in maintaining a company’s value and deterring hostile bids.

Defense Mechanisms

Cadbury considered various defense mechanisms, including seeking a “white knight” and using financial and legal barriers. Being prepared with various defense strategies can significantly strengthen your position in a takeover battle.

Lessons for M&A Practitioners

1. Engage Stakeholders: Build broad support by leveraging emotional and cultural connections.
2. Communicate Clearly: Effectively articulate the company’s actual value and potential.
3. Focus on Improvement: Show continuous operational excellence and strategic growth.
4. Be Prepared: Have a range of defense mechanisms ready to deploy.
5. Strong Leadership: Clear vision and effective leadership are crucial.

The Cadbury-Kraft case reminds us that M&A is not just about numbers; it’s about people, culture, and vision. What do you think about the role of emotional and cultural value in M&A? Have you seen these factors play a decisive role in your experiences? Share your thoughts!

[Peter J. Gondek]

Hi Jessica,

This is a well-written post. I agree with the defense mechanisms that Cadbury employed in their defense of the Kraft takeover. They tried nearly everything. My takeaway from his case was that, at the end of the day, the primary responsibility of management is to maximize Shareholder Value. They tried all they could to defend against the takeover. However, when Kraft’s final offer came in, it was too good for the shareholders not to accept it. The case was an exercise in shareholder value.

Thanks,
Peter

[Brandon Santos, PMP]

The cultural element in this case I do believe was a red herring as peter calls out, nonetheless, it is a key factor in which would certainly need to be addressed in the PMI . The case does not go on to say exactly how this would have been addressed, however, consideration to the brand, customer relations etc. would have to all be considered if the organization was going to remain successful with its customers.

[ZainSatardien]

The media and public narrative is also very important in a takeover of this magnitude. I have seen similar outcomes in large scale developments, when the big business is seen as the “bad guy” coming to profit monger from our natural resources or national heritage. It becomes a situation where non-commercial ideals such as profiteering and national pride affect commercial decisions, which ordinarily does not affect commercial decisions. Public negotiations are very sensitive and subject to nuanced variances based on any public action, which may cause speculation. Also, making sure that you create a white knight (or in negotiation science, a Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) can be valuable, and can put extra pressure on the buyer to provide a sweeter deal given the long journey and effort. Furthermore, making sure you know your playing field (the regulatory aspect) is important to avoid the other party from taking advantage of the regime’s process/procedure (for instance, put up or shut up, and new offer requirements), which could negatively affect buyer’s position. I think the key take home here is to be aware that any factor can be used to the advantage of the seller or the buyer to affect the value of the deal in such high-profile deals, whether tangible or intangible, commercial or non-commercial.

[Author]

Posts