As cyber threats grow more sophisticated and data privacy regulations multiply across jurisdictions, cybersecurity due diligence has moved from a technical afterthought to a core deal risk workstream. Yet many DD processes still treat it as a checkbox exercise.
How are practitioners structuring their cyber DD?
.
What does a meaningful assessment of a target’s security posture, incident history, and regulatory exposure actually look like in practice? And at what deal size or complexity threshold does it become non-negotiable?