- This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 3 months, 1 week ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Can the governance model be changed after the Post-Merger integration? While preparing for due diligence governance chare is created to know who all SME and BU leaders will work on integration. But does the governance chart be changed as per BU requirement?
Yes, the governance model set up during due diligence and early integration can be changed after post-merger integration, especially as business unit (BU) needs and realities evolve. It’s common for the initial governance chart—identifying SMEs and BU leaders—to be adapted as integration progresses and new challenges or priorities emerge. Adjusting governance ensures alignment with BU requirements, supports operational effectiveness, and addresses any unforeseen issues. Regularly reviewing and updating the governance structure is considered best practice, particularly in complex, people-driven industries like pharma. Transparent communication and stakeholder involvement are key to making these changes successful.
To provide a more tailored answer, could you share more about your specific context—such as the stage of integration, the size and structure of your BUs, or any particular challenges you’re facing?
Yes, we can change it a bit, but our governance models are well known practice and they work very well. However, we have the flexibility built into our models intentionally so that we can adjust as needed. That being said, our organization is open to refining it as necessary.
Yes, the governance model can and often should be adjusted after the Post-Merger Integration (PMI) phase to better align with evolving business needs and operational realities.
In order to become a charterholder you need to complete one of the IMAA programs