DD blind spots

This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  Eric Hubacheck 3 weeks, 6 days ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
  • #112548

    Kent Anderson

    One thing work life has taught me is that people return to what they are good at over and over. The inverse of this is people do not return to what they are not good at. M&A requires leaders to be good in many areas all at the same time. What are your thoughts on people’s personal strengths and weaknesses leading to blind spots during M&A?


    I think that sometimes people get so caught up in making the deal happen, that they ignore red flags. They fall in love with a deal and want to see it through even if it the deal starts to turn south and the logic would suggest that you stop the deal. You have put so much time and effort into it you don’t want to let it die.


    Eric Hubacheck

    That’s a great point Nancee. Behavioural analysis plays an integral role because the longer something drags out, the more biased the person is to see it through and the less likely they are able to cut their losses. This provides a challenge for dynamic due diligence processes, vs. rigid ones. I think it is difficult to remain emotionally junattached throughout the process, especially through the HR DD phase and understanding who the employees are on the other side of the table. It is very wrong to believe you will get to know who they are in a few week period. I believe this is where many threats will present themselves and not appear until the PMI stage, but I don’t have the experience to actually back this up.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Loading.. Please wait